@00dani talking about which, is the gender unicorn still a good representation and is it still the one used by people? (I discovered it when I was first looking at trans stuff before questioning my identity, and I like it, just want to know if things have changed since then)
@cesese hmm, i find it at least a little questionable? representing "sex assigned at birth" as a dna helix, but still putting it on that particular part of the unicorn, is very weird for example
genetics has almost nothing to do with assigned gender whatsoever so. yeah it's weird
and i'm not sure splitting physical attraction and emotional attraction is significant outside of aspec situations, which aren't accommodated here at all anyway since both physical and emotional attraction lack a "nobody" option
it's a lot better than the other chart being passed around imho, since it doesn't try to put, say, all the genders onto a linear axis
but it's still not ideal
@00dani @cesese Maybe the unicorn's still a useful thought-primer for inquiring folk. Guess that's all one can ask for. The axis one just feels like... wrong axes and terms? Incomplete analysis? The distinct probability that you're not gonna ever be able to boil out anything but an example to discuss and explain your -youness- with, and then discard?
Also horse mouths do not open that way, and I am very glad about this.
(But yes, shushing myself now and listening)
Equestria.Social (EQS) is a Mastodon instance for all pony fans, created to federate Bronies and Pegasisters wanting to join the fediverse, and those already present ! But we are opened to everyone !